Tomorrow will be 4 years ago that Shane died. Normally I close myself off from the world and feel the weight of that day pressing upon me, and let myself grieve for the loss. Tomorrow I’m going to ride my bike and take pictures, then I’m going to make some artwork. I’m still going to spend a lot of the time alone, but at least that will give me something constructive to do. I need to create.

I just watched an old Christmas video from 1997, I wanted to see and hear him alive again. It was the first time since the night before he died that I’ve heard his voice, his laugh, seen his face, his walk, his smile and seen him hold his children. Cole was one month away from his first birthday in the video, and Haley was five I think. It was also the first time since the day before she died that I got to see and hear Granny as well.

I am also looking at the last picture taken of him, approximately two minutes before he died. It was given to me by a friend of a friend who was there that day.

I am so flooded with memories and longing that I could drown in them. I read the letter that I wrote to Shane two days after the accident. It was the first time I read it since I read it aloud at his memorial service.

Maybe tomorrow I will go to the cemetery, I’m not very keen on going there normally because I don’t feel any attatchment to him there, but for whatever reason I think I want to go. Maybe I will.

I don’t have anything else to give right now, so I’ll stop.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 29, 2004 Comments (0)

It never ceases to amaze me how some people can be so completely full of shit, yet fully expect that you believe them just because they say so. Like I’m as stupid as you pretend are. Go get fucked.

Pride was alright, I was less than enthused about it this year. Don’t really know why, I suppose that a lot of it is just my reaction to something I cannot identify just yet. The rain was the least of it, too.

In general I feel pretty loathsome of many people, many things, and all for many different reasons.

In seven minutes, my best friend Staci will have been dead for 18 years and in two more days my best friend Shane will have been dead for four. Usually around this time of year, I’m very depressed. This time around, I’m caustic - radioactive - angry - disgusted.

I’m going to watch some mindless TV and drink a beer or two. Fuck all.

Current Mood:

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 27, 2004 Comments (0)


Web browser flaw prompts warning [BBCNews.com]

Users are being told to avoid using Internet Explorer until Microsoft patches a serious security hole in it.

The loophole is being exploited to open a backdoor on a PC that could let criminals take control of a machine.

The threat of infection is so high because the code created to exploit the loophole has somehow been placed on many popular websites.

Experts say the list of compromised sites involves banks, auction and price comparison firms and is growing fast.

Serious problem

The net watchdog, the US Computer Emergency Reponse Center, and the net security monitor, the Internet Storm Center, have both issued warnings about the combined threat of compromised websites and browser loophole.

Cert said: “Users should be aware that any website, even those that may be trusted by the user, may be affected by this activity and thus contain potentially malicious code.”

In its round-up of the threat the Internet Storm Center bluntly stated that users should if possible “use a browser other then MS Internet Explorer until the current vulnerabilities in MSIE are patched.”

So far it is unclear how the malicious code that exploits the weakness in Microsoft’s Internet Explorer has been inserted on popular websites.

What is known that any Windows 2000 Server that does not have the MS04-011 security update installed and is running Internet Information Server could be at risk.

The virulent Sasser worm exploited loopholes closed by this update so many servers are likely to be patched against the problem.

Infected servers are adding a malicious chunk of Javascript to all the web, gif and jpg files served up to anyone browsing the sites they host.

When loading on a browsing PC, this chunk of code might trigger a Windows error message.

Once downloaded the code redirects a browser to a Russian website which tries to install a program that opens a backdoor into the PC.

Some net service firms have started blocking access to this Russian site.

Check for infection

Anti-virus firms are now working on putting detectors for the chunk of code in to their scanning software.

Security firm Symantec said the malicious code was not widespread and did little damage.

The reason that the server/browser combination has been created remains a mystery.

Some speculate that it is the work of spammers looking to create yet another network of compliant PCs that can be used as proxies to spread junk mail.

Microsoft has issued advice to consumers and web administrators about dealing with the problem.

Administrators are urged to apply the update that will make them immune to infection.

Home users are being told to update their browser and avoid the threat by turning off Javascript. However, this could mean that some webpages do not display as expected.

Microsoft has also given advice about how people can check if they are infected.

So far the server/browser combination has not been given a single name. In its warning about the problem Microsoft calls it download.ject but others, such as F-Secure, are calling it Scob.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 25, 2004 Comments (0)

After a brief hiatus, Digital Design is back online.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 24, 2004 Comments (0)

“If you think Muhammad is embarrassed by his followers, just imagine how Jesus feels about the Crusades and the Inquisition.”

“I have decided to run for president. My lone issue is outlawing those little postcards that fall out of magazines while you are trying to read them.”

“Will all 130,000 people in town for the Mega Fest 2004 Christian worship celebration stay around for Gay Pride this weekend?”

“How does Ralph Nader make a living? Are the Republicans paying him?”

“Every election year, our overextended and bail-out-by-filing-bankruptcy neighbor places Republican campaign signs in his front yard. Given the huge deficits of the past few GOP presidents, I finally see the correlation.”

More here.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | Comments (0)

Today I am feeling rather angry with Jeff Buckley for ever going into the water. Only because it is raining and I tend to associate his death and my favorite Buckley song (Lover, You Should’ve Come Over) with the rain. I associate the rain with his death because it began raining the night he drowned in Memphis and didn’t stop for almost 24 hours. I associate the song with the rain for two reasons. One of them is New Orleans and the first time I really heard that song, the first time I really took him in and let him feed my tattered soul with the best of himself. The other is the opening line of the song itself.

So.

I was sitting on the front porch of a Bed & Breakfast in New Orleans owned by some friends of mine, looking down the street into the French Quarter and the Mississippi River. This was when I still smoked, and I had gone to the porch to have a cigarette and have some quiet observation time and finally listen to this man sing. It was at the urging of another friend who told me that I would have a very strong reaction to him and this song in particular, and I’d brought the cd along with my discman. Now seemed as good a time as any, it was just after dinner and it was oddly quiet for New Orleans outside in the summertime. That should’ve been my first tip off, really, that it was a warm summer evening on the edge of the French Quarter in New Orleans and it was practically devoid of people.

Dark storm clouds were gathering, there was a little thunder and a lot of lightning. Across the street was a bakery, a wine shop, a news stand, and a coffeehouse. All over the neighborhood you could smell things exclusive to New Orleans and the South in general, scents I have come to love over the years that can make an evening outside doing absolutely nothing a voyage of discovery just from their fingerprints on the air if you let your nose be your compass. Confederate jasmine, baguettes baking in an ancient Creole brick oven with the memory of hundreds - thousands of loaves before etched in the clay, coffee and chicory, steam from fat raindrops scorched on the unforgiving pavement of a Southern road in August, cut grass, and that smell that really old, cozy houses have. If I remember it all hard enough and close my eyes, I’d surely float right up and out of this chair…

I’d read a little about him at this point, so I knew that he’d drowned four years earlier in the Wolf River, which feeds into the Mississippi at Memphis. I sat on the porch steps just inside the portico. I put the headphones on my ears just as the rain was being delivered from the clouds in sheets that came in sideways towards the other side of the street, put my newly purchased Grace cd in the player, and dialed up track 7 as I was told to do. I started the song and sat there, just taking it in for a bit while the opening notes declared a eulogy for something or someone, this sad, ancient harmonium droning out these minor chords that made me first think “Wow, he’s a pretty brave bastard to begin a song with something like that”. I read the credits in the liner notes to see what his musical part of the recording was. Dulcimer? Harmonium? Tablas? I was liking this more and more, and hadn’t even heard the first guitar chord yet. Then it happened, the air went still and electric, and I heard his voice for the first time with this line that exemplified where I was and what was going on in that moment…

“Looking out the door I see the rain fall upon the funeral mourners,
parading in a wake of sad relations as their shoes fill up with water…”

I was in New Orleans, the one place in North America that honors its dead with little cities, where death is celebrated as much as life, and where decay of some sort is as much a pattern in the landscape as cornfields are to Illinois and Ohio. Two blocks to my right, directly in my peripheral, lay the murderous Mississippi River, its swirling, dark currents visible even in the burgeoning rain, like watery flamenco dancers. And still the rain, coming down just as I i
magined it did when he was writing this for Rebecca Moore (the woman whom I later learned inspired the song), the transitive realtionship to the entire moment. I stopped the song, restarted it, put it on repeat, got up, and began to walk. By the time I reached the end of the song and in fact the end of the street, and it was starting over again I was navigating huge slabs of granite and kudzu on my way down to the water. I took my shoes off and put my feet in the water, and sat down along the riverbank. The rain was all but drizzle and mist at this point, although the thunder and lightning were still very evident. Not that I cared, I was having too significant an experience to atone to the dangers of my own mortality which at the time seemed very trivial to me. I stared at the water, knowing it was the same that claimed him for itself, and cried for what I knew would never be again. Mind you, I hadn’t at this point heard anything other than this one song.

I am not sure how long I was there or when I began crying or even what I went through emotionally, but by the time I started back to the B&B (soaked to the skin) I knew every word of “Lover, You Should’ve Come Over” - every note, every intonation, entirely. I also knew that I’d never be the same and that I would wish for a couple more years that someone would pine for me as passionately in that same way as he so clearly had, until I found it for myself.

Goddamn you, Jeff - just goddamn you.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | Comments (0)

I’ve been very ill lately, the long and short of it is that I got some sort of wierd stomach bug last week that has wreaked complete havoc on my digestive tract over the past several days. It’s astounding when I think about it, I’ve eaten (and kept down) in the past three days what the average person consumes in an average meal. I’ve dehydrated myself and gotten weak and dizzy from simply standing up too quickly. All in all I’ve felt like four sacks of shit with a side of smashed assholes. I’m not kidding, this thing was terrible. I won’t go into details, but suffice it to say, I’ve drank half a bottle of Pepto Bismol (feels stomach lurching yet again) in the past 18 hours. I had a reasonable dinner earlier (a simple vegetable plate from Country’s) and though it is still feeling like schrapnel in my stomach, I’m keeping it down. The chamomile tea is also helping soothe my angry tummy. Okay, enough of that.

Still reading through my stuff, so bear with me and - I’m a few days behind on covering documentation, but I’ll have the brunt of next week to myself to devote more time to it. I’m mostly finished, save for the last bits, and am going to reread the entirety of it so as to have it fresh in my mind. That and I hope a reread will put it all into better perspective.

I feel very weak and shaky, but my strength will come back in a day or so and I’ll feel closer to 100% by the end of the week. I’m still excited about the weekend, Damien’s best friend Brian is coming into town to spend the day with us on Saturday and then we’re headed to Atlanta on Sunday morning.

By the way, all of you should be as lucky as I am to have the sweetest, cutest, most attentive and otherwise wonderful man in the entire world for a partner as I have in Damien. I swear, he amazes me with his kindness almost every day. He’s also funny as hell when he’s not trying to be. When I told him today that he deserves much better than me, he agreed very stoically with “Yeah, that’s true” and I laughed out loud for the first time in a week.

For some reason or other, I’ve been thinking a great deal about my friend over the past few days, so wherever you are my sweetie I hope you’re safe and well. I keep you in my thoughts and send you good energy. If you’re up to it, come to Pride on Sunday and I’ll see you there!

Kisses and hugs for all who need them tonight…

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 22, 2004 Comments (0)

In Andalusia, one of the many delicacies they produce is called Mojama. It is dry cured loin cut of tuna, and it is something almost no one (besides those seriously into epicurean rareities) really knows about outside of Spain. It is cured in the same way, with salt and hot coastal breezes, since at least the Arab Conquest. Today, I feel like the tuna that stay tethered to their hooks in deep, cold, blue, fathomless waters, destined to be Mojama. Someone, somewhere, wants to come along sooner or later and gut me, rub salt into the exposed wounds, and leave me hanging out to dry in pieces. They want to consume me whole, make me disappear. And though I know this, know that they are going to try just because they can, I’m just tethered to this hook and cannot get away. So I wait to see just who my executioner is going to be, imagining their face and what their hands might feel like lustily slicing into my flesh. Imagining the surprise on their face when they get careless and cut themselves instead…

So much has happened over the past few days. For starters, I’ve been unwell for several days now, am eating little and sleeping about as much. Add to this the fact that I’m overstimulated, stressed out, and depressed again and you have one unhappy me. If I could just get 10 minutes of time to NOT think about anything - anything at all - I might work on getting back my peace of mind.

Yesterday was Columbus Pride, and I spent most of my time there getting people registered to vote at the Georgia Equality table. It was a long day, and by the time we left I was running out of energy. Then last night Damien and I stayed at the new house, where we, along with his roomate and our good friend Mike had a little drinks and dinner get together with a few friends. One of the guests was my friend Gabi, we spent a good deal of the evening talking about religion, politics, and the Middle East. I hadn’t seen her in a few years, so we spoke at length on the Middle Eastern culture and her daughter, my friend Alia. Alia’s father (Gabi’s former husband) is from Pakistan, so Middle Eastern culture and Islam were of some interest in the conversation. It was good to see her and even better to talk to someone who stimulated me. Gabi is great, her Catholicism notwithstanding. I had a chocolate martini at 5PM, and a vodka and grapefruit at about 10 - both of which made me tired and gave me a slight headache. I also smoked two cigarettes last night, as is probable when I’m drinking. I had to brush my teeth immediately after each one, it made me feel like an ashtray had taken a giant shit in my mouth. Not pleasant, I’m really glad I don’t smoke anymore.

I did get to spend some time with Damien’s family today, we went swimming and had a good time until my throat, sinuses, and ears got the best of me. I called and talked to my father for almost an hour, whch was nice that I caught him before he left for New Orleans. I mentioned to him several of my favorite places there, and he said he just might check them out. He got a new dog and has done some more renovating on the house, apparently this last undertaking was pretty major. All in all it was a nice conversation.

I’ve been very worried about a lot of things and having to prioritize a lot in my head and my heart. All of this worrying is definitely having an effect on my physical and psychological wellbeing, I have no doubt. I’ve been bothered with the irritating aspects of people I’ll take care not to out here, as honestly they are numerous and it would take longer to do that than I have the time and energy for. Suffice it to say, my used-to-be endless patience for people’s quirks, eccentricities, and shortcomings is at an all time low. Casting aside my current state of mind, I like myself. Very much. And if you don’t like me, then get fucked. Pretty simplistic, but workable.

Some people wear their haloes too tight. I’d made a list a few years ago, and that last line made it on the list I gave to my old friend Toni who reminded me of it today. It made me
think of something else It really is damn near impossible to take some folks seriously, no matter how hard they may try. Especially those who come at you smiling, knife in one hand and your throat in the other, just waiting to hang you out in the sun to dry.

I’m just about worn out in every sense of that phrase. I think I might be able to sleep now, I hope so.

Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | June 21, 2004 Comments (0)

  • Miscellaneous other topics

    Note that third-party complaints were being rejected all along; first located precedent is on June 14, 2001. There are some signs that this was intermittent rather than consistent at first.

    On February 18, 2002, the question of whether or not users can redirect to their off-site page with their LiveJournal embedded in it is brought up and, while consensus is that it’s probably okay, there is a note that the potential for abuse would exist in it.

    On June 18, 2002, a mass suspension of accounts in a case that can only be called no redeeming content (trolling; bestiality; IoP in the form of AIM conversations). Comments link to additional posts/issues related to this.

    On October 18, 2002, we see one of the first instances of a user banned from community and unable to edit or remove his or her posts. Policy at the time was to force the maintainer to re-add the user temporarily.

    On December 1, 2002, Jill clarified that we should no longer transfer maintainership of communities to abuse team members (a former policy when maintainers were missing, until a permanent maintainer could be found) but instead a new maintainer selected.

    On January 20, 2003, a user was first told that further requests that did not contain a violation of the ToS would be closed. This is used only when an individual is opening multiple baseless requests, or wasting Abuse team time.

    On March 11, 2003, one of the first instances of accounts being suspended for credit card fraud hits the board. These suspensions are done by Accounts, and should be handled by them.

  • Non-LJ Issues

    Basically, if they are doing it outside of LiveJournal and not linking to it from LiveJournal or discussing it on LiveJournal, there’s not a whole lot we can do. On August 25, 2001, there is a case where one user is sending another user’s protected entries around in email. Quite simply, the appropriate response to that is to take them off your friends list. If they’d posted it on LiveJournal, it might have been actionable.

    On September 9, 2001, there is a brief indication that linking content from your journal, where the content would be violating if present in your journal, is not necessarily considered a violation. This precedent does not appear to have been applied after this, however.

  • Obscenity

    Normally, obscenity doesn’t receive much action unless it’s in a userpic. The rule about obscene journals is, if it’s legal for consenting adults, and those are consenting adults, either read it or not as you please; it’s permissible. However, it’s another matter if you have no choice, such as a case where someone posts obscene pictures in comments to other users as a sort of spam (September 14, 2001). The picture in that post is now a broken link and probably has been for some time. Comments contain a discussion of the difference between placing it in your own journal and someone else’s.

  • Parental Requests Regarding Journals

    This request from August 28, 2002, demonstrates the beginnings of the policy that users under 18 are also protected by our confidentiality clauses, and
    we will not provide information (even to a parent) without a court order.

  • Pro-anorexia Issues

    The pro-anorexia communities have generated a fair number of abuse issues over time, including some write-in campaigns, and continue to do so. The first discussion of this takes place on August 7, 2001, and is ambivalent, although leaning toward suspending them. The second discussion, on August 13, has the same tone, except for a comparison to smoking and other things that endanger the person doing them.

    By October 5, 2001, had done enough pro-ana cases to have a fairly set answer that could be flexed to the request.

    On December 11, 2001, an email exchange was noted in the journal that phrased the situation differently, although the same basic approach (no action will be taken) was used. That was also the day that a user requested the Terms of Service be amended to make these communities a violation. The matter was placed into the community for discussion but there basically was none. The request linked from the post is well worth reading.

    The following day, Tommy posts a quote from an eating-disorders expert that generally bears out the consensus that has been evolving.

    July 3, 2002, a write-in campaign regarding them is noted (including a cut’n'paste letter). There’s a followup post the same day regarding the spamming of comments to organize the write-in, and the abuse team’s response being posted. The following day, a request is made for a team member to temporarily take over the pro_ana community, which appears to be having problems and an AWOL maintainer. (Another community is in similar straits at the same time.)

    On July 5, 2002, a standard answer for requests protesting pro-ana communities is posted.

    However, when a community is clearly nothing more than active incitement for self-injury, with no element of support, it can be suspended.

    Additional sample cases:

  • Racism/Hate

    There was, at the outset, a very draconian stance on this topic, that often resulted in immediate suspension or very short time periods for removal of the offending material. In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, on September 12, 2001, it’s proposed that anyone who posts with a Bin Laden user pic be immediately suspended, but the ensuing exchange negates that decision.

    On November 14, 2001, a user tries to cover for it by putting a disclaimer that all comments are satirical in their user info rather than removing the offenses they were told to. User is told to remove the
    offenses or face suspension, as a disclaimer is not enough to make them compliant with the original direction to remove the remarks.

    On February 9, 2002, a case of a user having nazi banners (in posts? in userpics?) prompted a discussion of what exactly was hate speech and unacceptable pictures on LiveJournal. With some interesting conclusions that we could slide too far down a slippery slope, if we weren’t careful.

    By September 04, 2002, policies had changed to the point where racially charged language was not a violation, as long as it was not the primary focus of the journal. This is reinforced on September 5. (and again)

    Policy continued to shift — on October 16, 2002, suspension was requested for an account that promoted white power, but the suspension was never done because the user had changed the community by the time that the suspender could view it. White pride communities remained suspendable, however.

    By December 28, 2002, policy had mostly shifted to requiring incitement of violence in order for something to be considered a violation.

    By March 19, 2003, this shift was complete. Past this date, in order for material to qualify as “hate speech”, it must directly promote violence.

    Other sample cases:

  • Church of Scientology

    If you spot a case involving the Church of Scientology, do not answer it. Mark it for the abuse manager, and email a notification. (If the manager is known to be away, or if there’s no response within a day, email all LiveJournal employees who monitor lj_abuse.)

    On April 8, 2002, such a case came in and the employees weren’t notified right away, which led to this post, that gives some idea of how bad such an encounter could get.

    The Scientologists are back on September 17, 2002, at which point things are handled a little better.

  • Security Holes on LiveJournal

    As a note, if you encounter a new security hole, do not post about it. Not in public, not in …nowhere. (Unless you’re not sure it’s a security hole, or you think abuse will be slammed with requests about it shortly. Even then, not in public! is another matter.) Email the site admins with all the information that you have on the matter. Let them clean it up. Still, in the process of chasing other things, some of these get posted about sometimes.

    August 29, 2001. A user found a hole that allowed him to write a script to spam-post to different posts by itemid. It avoided ip address logging. There was some concern that this brought the site to its kenes, but that was actually an unrelated problem (certain parties were trying to improve the site performance…). Note the discussion in the comments underlines how important it is to be careful when discussing possible security holes with users (in the case where they are reporting them)!

    December 24, 2001. In a thread also linked in the cracked accounts section, discussing insecurity due to email address changes, a bug was identified that could permit a user to validate an email address that they did not have access to on their account. (It has since been fixed. The mechanics are described in the comments. Since infohistory wasn’t available at the time, this would have allowed an abuser to totally dissociate from their main account - not a big deal as they could also do that with an alternate email - OR, worse yet, associate it with an innocent’s account - without that person doing anything. It made the entire method of taking action against all of someone’s journals suspect. This exchange is a good example of what looks like a minor nuisance actually having
    serious implications.)

  • Spam

    Septmeber 25, 2001, has a fairly straightforward spam case where a user is spamming other journals and is told that it’s a violation of the service, with a sample/rough outline of a possible email to send. This is pretty straightforward and the precedent (and sample emails) grow more frequent in 2002, though mass-spamming of journals is not as frequent as it might be (fortunately).

    May 11, 2002, an unusual case of spamming where two users have a rapid-fire comment exchange, with intent to spam/harrass, on another user’s entry.

    May 23, 2002, lj-nifty is spammed by a user who fills the post limit with “hi” over and over - the user is suspended by Brad but there was a related case.

    May 28, 2002, user _berzerker is suspended for spam summarily (the post doesn’t list the reasoning but says it will follow shortly) and then the reasons do indeed follow. Turns out the user spammed a community with over 100 posts of links, to a site that stuck up popups, rude messages, viruses (set off a team member’s virus scanner pretty solidly), etc., and even crashed someone’s computer. At this time, posts by suspended members to communities still showed, so there was a followup email to the community maintainer to get that stuff out of there and warn members about the virus possibility if they’d followed a link.

    In a followup to the previous one, on May 29, it’s noted that community maintainers may not be able to delete these things and an employee removes them (via direct database access) instead.

    On September 26, 2002, the spam policy is revisited, and becomes “instant 30-day suspend”, along with distinctions about the different types of spam.

    A number of policies were clarified on March 9, 2003, including phone numbers, spam, emails to suspended users, posting of abuse team email, and unsuspensions until compliance.

    Starting on November 20, 2003, LiveJournal began experiencing problems with anonymous comment spam, which led to the spamreports system, sysban tools, and a number of other features.

    Other sample cases:

  • Stalking

    January 4, 2002. A reply to a user describes what LiveJournal would consider to be stalking. It is sent with the copyright notice in use at the time.

  • Suicidal Posts / Suicides / Deaths

    June 27, 2001. A user asks whether it would violate the Terms of Service to make fictional entries in which he ultimately commits suicide. The decision, at that time, is that it would
    not be a violation. (The fallout from one or two of these cases ultimately led to a change of heart regarding the matter, sometime in 2002, since they spawn abuse cases and calls to police that use up real resources.)

    August 19, 2001. A user posts threatening to commit suicide and the requester wants to know if we log ip addresses posted from. We don’t, nor does the user have contact info for this person, which makes it difficult (impossible) to contact proper authorities.

    On September 3, 2001, there was a parental request to suspend the account of someone killed in a car crash - noted in case the request was, in fact, a hoax and the account might need to be unsuspended later.

    On October 8, 2001, there was a case about a user who had committed suicide. Although it was a third-party request (not next-of-kin but a friend), the journal was suspended temporarily, pending receipt of instructions from the family/next-of-kin as to whether they wanted a permanent memorial (leaving the account up) or to keep it suspended. Because of the nature of such cases, this is at the discretion of the family.

    On July 29, 2002, a suicide threat is noted in kewlimesrevenge. The report had been filed on July 18, when it would have been far more timely, but was lost for a time due to the bug that put some requests in no category. It turns out to be a hoax. It is found to belong to quasidan, who has to acknowledge it’s a hoax (in the hoax journal). The full explanation is here. The email sent is posted in the early morning hours of the following day. Followups are here and here. The matter was closed on August 1, 2002, with this post.

    The team continued to attempt to get help to users who were contemplating or actively committing suicide. On May 29, 2003, the urgency of timely intervention in the event of an immediate threat was reiterated.

    A few days later, on June 1, 2003, Solcita (a 911 dispatcher) posted information about how to make a call on a suicide threat.

  • Syndicated Accounts

    On August 1, 2002, the first complaint of harassment in the comments to a syndicated feed is received. Because syndicated accounts have no owner, they create a problem with harassment.

    The first suspended syndicated account was discussed on November 22, 2002 — a ljdrama.org syndication. The reason for the suspension at the time was that it was “evasion of suspension via syndication” — the content had been removed from LiveJournal’s servers via suspension, and then was being served back onto LiveJournal’s servers via syndication.

    This came up again on December 28, 2002, when the question of when to suspend syndicated accounts was brought up for discussion. The essential question (unanswered for quite some time) was: if something would be a ToS violation if posted on LJ, should it also be a ToS violation if posted via syndication?

    The infamous “Mitc
    h Wagner” case happened on December 29, 2002, where an off-site blogger published a RSS feed and then got very upset when it was used. The phrase “mitching”, by analogy with “bitching”, experienced a brief vogue; the definition of “mitching” is “complaining about someone else using the RSS feed that you yourself published”.

    A policy on syndicated feeds was explicitly detailed on January 13, 2004.

    On May 3, 2003, precedent was established that syndicated feeds from LJ clone sites will be suspended on request, since users have no control over these things.

  • Threats Against Users

    People have been threatening other people on LiveJournal since the very beginning (see: harassment, invasion of privacy), but starting on October 18, 2002, one of the first instances of

  • The Real Condition of Humanity

    The dance of life occurs not yesterday or tomorrow, but only here at the still point that is the present. This truth is simple, self-evident, but difficult to accept, for we sentimentalize the past and wallow in it, while we endure the moment and in every waking hour dream of the future.

    What you hope to do in the future is of no meaning if you fail to do the wise thing, the good thing, moment by moment by moment, here at the still point, here in the dance of life.

    -Dean Koontz

    Filed under: LiveJournal Posts | Brad | Comments (0)

    Powered by WordPress | Design by Roy Tanck